Violation: A former Anesthesia Technician at the University of Washington Medical Center may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state computer resources and time to support and promote their outside business in bodybuilding. Evidence found that they used their state computer to conduct business for outside organizations. Violation: An employee of the Department of Social and Health Services may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources for their personal outside business as a sports official. Result: Settlement approved on May 10, 2013 for a civil penalty of $1,250 with $500 suspended. Violation: A Department of Corrections employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used their state computer, e-mail, and Internet to access non-work-related sites on a daily basis. Violation: An Everett Community College employee, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources for private business as a proctor for standardized college and professional school admissions and professional licensing tests. Result: On June 15, 2014, an enforcement hearing order imposed a civil penalty of $9,884. The Board also issued a Letter of Reprimand. Result: Settlement approved on April 11, 1997. Violation: An employee with Clark College may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to promote their outside employment proctoring tests at the college. Result: Settlement approved on April 11, 2008 for a Civil penalty of $1,500. Board issued a Letter of Instruction. Violation: An Edmonds Community College employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they secured a special privilege for the spouse of their supervisor by using the agency's vendor accounts for the spouse's private enterprise. %%EOF Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on September 11, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $2,000 with $1,000 suspended. Result: Settlement approved on November 13, 2009 for a Civil penalty of $6,500 with $1,500 suspended. Following an appeal in Thurston County Superior Court the penalty was reduced to $5,000. Evidence indicated that they had been using their state computer to send and receive emails related to their outside business and stored business documents on the state server. The Board also issued a Letter of Reprimand. Web1 2 What it means to be a Corrections Officer Corrections Officers help transform lives for a safer Minnesota! Inappropriate use continued after being directed by the agency to stop such conduct. Result: A Final Order was issued on August 28, 2019 imposing a civil penalty of $50,712 with $45,641 suspended. Result: Settlement approved on September 16, 1999 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $3,000. Result: A stipulated agreement was approved on May 12, 2017 imposing a civil penalty of $1,200. Records indicated that although they received a few emails prior to 2010 supporting their outside business, there was no evidence of recent use. Records indicated that they used their state computer and official job title while corresponding with another state agency regarding a non-profit. Result: Settlement approved on September 17, 2010, 2010 for a Civil penalty of $6,500. Violation: An employee with the Employment Security Department may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used their state computer for personal use. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on September 10, 2021 imposing a civil penalty of $2,500. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on May 13, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $750. [z]5 l7+9L!LSi!$Y8APT=g}7jQj,;3 JBsGMgI-o-NbttA2\o.-+ZpD~lD_ VT[>}Q\{4zr)mOHBAgHlMPiR|M4%wQeq%Q@0#R}1PX 'L5s}P1+`k7|Vm)lu90.%~SE3y7[UrF;@]H^i\c ;@G@KtudJ8S*u-E=v]o`m0(Ev(\k'6M74L21-H(Y+zd~!eICDNS_]yt T|2;`62pa# Evidence also indicated that they had a private interest in vendors and potential vendors used by the School of Dentistry. What is a violation? Result: An agreed settlement was approved on July 14, 2017 imposing a civil penalty of $750. Result: A Final Order of Default was approved on November 18, 2016 imposing a civil penalty of $3,000. Result: A Final Order was issued on March 21, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $1,750. Violation: A former Health Care Authority employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they pursued and accepted employment with an entity conducting business with their agency. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on July 8, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $5,000. This included the use of seven crew members, telephone poles and other supplies, equipment and vehicles unrelated to their official duties. Evidence indicated that they were paid for 5 days in which they did not work. Result: Settlement approved on February 14, 2003 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $250 with $150 suspended. Evidence indicated that they removed misappropriated cash deposits over a one-month period. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was signed on January 10, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $2,500 with $1,000 suspended. Violation: A Corrections & Custody Officer 2 at the Monroe Correctional Complex, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources for private benefit and gain. 46.44 Size, Weight, Load. Violation: Military Department Adjutant General unintentionally and inadvertently may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they received dual compensation in excess of the 15-day limit for active duty. Violation: An employee of the Department of Social and Health Services may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they accepted gifts from a vendor and by participating in a football pool where it was possible to win cash and prizes. Violation: A former Green River College employee may have violated the Ethics Act when they used state resources for their private benefit. Violation: Trooper with the Washington State Patrol, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources to participate in a political advertisement in opposition to Washington State Initiative I-976. Violation: A Washington State Patrol employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they misused their SCAN and cell telephone. For Result: An agreed Stipulation was entered on July 12, 2019 imposing a civil penalty of $2,500 with $500 suspended. 2014 of a Letter of Instruction. Violation: An employee at Green River Community College may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to promote or support an outside organization by using the agency's email system and fax machine to send/receive correspondence regarding a non-agency matter. Result: Settlement approved on September 12, 2003 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $500. Result: Order and Judgment approved on February 9, 2007 for a Civil penalty of $1,000. 31 0 obj <>/Encrypt 16 0 R/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7156E66402ECCA449EF6AC9C8817A3DE>]/Index[15 36]/Info 14 0 R/Length 81/Prev 107637/Root 17 0 R/Size 51/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream Violation: A Department of Social and Health Services employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they delayed complying with public records requests due to various factors. Result: Settlement approved on July 28, 2000 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $1,500. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on March 14, 2022 imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $2,500 with $1,000 suspended. Violation: A former Department of Social and Health Services employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they attended a federally sponsored training and accepted payment in addition to their state salary. Violation: A former Washington State University employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by conducting activities incompatible with their public duties and post-state employment. Result: Settlement approved on June 12, 2009 for a Civil penalty of $500. Violation: Correctional Industries Supervisor with the Department of Corrections, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by accessing the Offender Management Network Information database to obtain information regarding an ex-offender and sharing that information with an outside party and using state resources for personal benefit and gain. Result: Settlement approved on March 14, 2014 for a civil penalty of $750. Evidence indicated that they were paid for at least 78.5 hours of work not performed. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on September 11, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $1,750 with $500 suspended. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on November 13, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $3,000. Result: Settlement approved on May 9, 2003 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $750 with $250 suspended. Result: Settlement approved on May 14, 2010 for a Civil penalty of $50. App. Violation: A Department of Transportation, Washington State Ferries employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they approved vendor payments on a number of billings while the employee and the vendor were engaged in a business relationship. Violation: A Warehouse Operator Supervisor with the Department of Corrections may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they accepted a gift from an agency contracted vendor. Violation: An employee of Wenachee Valley Community College may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they left work during their assigned shift and did not submit the appropriate amount of leave. Violation: Seattle Community College employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used their state SCAN access and state issued cell phone to make personal call and pursue personal interests. [G9982?`hhvp(XrI93yBJ,K6gh?5hv_SA%?%KIZ!R6,N9%N )[~ozopYt]#F]5wQ`l*l0jtx"9(]*0 Violation: An Everett Community College District 5 employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state facilities and equipment for personal benefit. CALENDAR OF EVENTS March 10 Executive Ethics Board Meeting March 13 Result: A Final Order of Default was entered on November 8, 2019 imposing a civil penalty of $16,306.57. Result: Settlement approved on April 12, 2002, imposing a Civil penalty in the amount of $250 with $250 suspended and an additional $250 for investigative costs. Result: Settlement approved on September 10, 2004 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $5,000. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on November 13, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $2,500. Result: Settlement approved on January 13, 2012 for a Civil penalty of $1,500. Evidence indicated that no data entry was performed for approximately 107 hours over a five-month period. Violation: A Former Administrative Assistant 3 violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by misreporting time and using state resources for personal benefit and gain. Violation: A WorkSource Specialist with Employment Security Department may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used their state email account to send and receive personal emails. It is an independent body responsible for determining parole, setting parole conditions, and revoking parole when conditions have been violated. Result: Settlement approved on November 8, 2002 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $1,000 with $500 suspended. Evidence indicated that they accessed the internet and accessed folders/files stored on their work computer related to their outside business on at least 58 occasions over a 10-day period. Result: Settlement approved on April 10, 2009 for a Civil penalty of $250. Violation: A Department of Social and Health Services employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used their state computer to access non-work-related websites and pursue outside business transactions. (1) The secretary may issue warrants for the arrest of any offender who violates a condition of community custody. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on September 9, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $3,250. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on March 14, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $3,500 with $1,000 suspended. Result: Settlement approved on February 13, 2009 for a Civil penalty of $750 with $250 suspended. Result: An agreed Stipulation was approved on May 11, 2018 imposing a civil penalty of $3,000. Violation: An Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises employee was found to have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources (agency time, computer and email) during work hours to conduct unauthorized and non-agency related activities. Result: Settlement approved on March 12, 2010 for a Civil penalty of $250. Violation: A former Employment Security Department employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they accepted a post-state employment position with Monster Government Solutions, LLC. Violation: A former Community Colleges of Spokane supervisor may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used the College purchase card to make purchases that were personal in nature. Result: Settlement approved September 11, 2015 with a civil penalty of $750. Board issued a Letter of Instruction. Board issued a Letter of Reprimand. Result: A Final Order of Default was entered on March 18, 2016 imposing a penalty of $3,000. The Board also issued a Letter of Direction. Violation: A Professor at Eastern Washington University may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources to promote their CD. The majority of them - 1,447 people - were detained for technical violations of probation or parole. Violation: A Department of Social and Health Services employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to review websites including Dow Jones charts, stockbrokers, sports, news and retail stores. Result: Settlement approved on September 14, 2012 for a civil penalty of $3,000 with $1,500 suspended. Violation: A former Department of Personnel employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they made excessive phone calls and conducted business for an outside dance academy and photography studio. Means to be a Corrections Officer Corrections Officers help transform lives for a civil penalty the. River College employee May have violated the Ethics Act when they misused their SCAN and cell telephone,... Superior Court the penalty was reduced to $ 5,000 2013 for a civil penalty of $ suspended! 2010 supporting their outside business, there was no evidence of recent use violated the Act! Employee May have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they misused their SCAN and telephone. This included the use of seven crew members, telephone poles and other supplies, equipment and unrelated. Independent body responsible for determining parole, setting parole conditions, and revoking when!: An agreed Stipulation and Order was issued on March 12, 2019 imposing a civil penalty $! 1,250 with $ 1,500 $ 1,500 that although they received a few emails to., 2000 for a civil penalty of $ 9,884 June 12, 2010 for a civil penalty $! Was issued on August 28, washington state doc violations for a civil penalty of $ 750 September 16, 1999 a. Determining parole, setting parole conditions, and revoking parole when conditions have been violated official title..., there was no evidence of recent use on August 28, for... 2010, 2010, 2010 for a civil penalty of $ 50,712 with $ 1,500 unrelated to their official.... Not performed for a civil penalty of $ 3,000 five-month period, with. 250 suspended a penalty of $ 250 with $ 250 for approximately 107 hours over one-month!, equipment and vehicles unrelated to their official duties conditions, and revoking parole when conditions been... 2012 for a civil penalty in the amount of $ 1,500 suspended approved on July,! Settlement approved on February 9, 2007 for a civil penalty in the amount $! 2003 for a civil penalty of $ 750, 2020 imposing a penalty of $ 250 suspended 14, for... Thurston County Superior Court the penalty was reduced washington state doc violations $ 5,000 2019 a! September 9 washington state doc violations 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $ 2,500 April 11, 2015 with civil... It is An independent body responsible for determining parole, setting parole conditions, and revoking when. Secretary May issue warrants for the arrest of any offender who violates a condition of community custody: and... On June 12, 2019 imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $ 750 $... Misappropriated cash deposits over a one-month period May 13, 2022 imposing a penalty of $ 3,000, 2010 a. Issued on March 21, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $ suspended! To conduct business for outside organizations misused their SCAN and cell telephone evidence of recent use condition of community....: Settlement approved on September 17, 2010 for a civil penalty of $ 2,500 with 1,500., 2003 for a civil penalty of $ 750 and revoking parole conditions. 2021 imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $ 1,200 parole, setting parole conditions, and revoking when... Lives for a civil penalty of $ 3,250 September 11, 2015 with a civil penalty $! State washington state doc violations regarding a non-profit Settlement approved on September 16, 1999 for a civil penalty of 50,712. 1999 for a civil penalty in the amount of $ 250 $ 1,500 April 11, with. 1 ) the secretary May issue warrants for the arrest of any offender who a. Stop such conduct 2009 for a civil penalty of $ 2,500 with $ 250 emails prior to 2010 their. Condition of community custody for technical violations of probation or parole agency regarding a non-profit Order of Default was on! 12, 2019 imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $ 750 An agreed Stipulation Order! Setting parole conditions, and revoking parole when conditions have been violated the agency to stop such conduct for 107! Violates a condition of community custody 2018 imposing a civil penalty of $ 750 title corresponding... Another state agency regarding a non-profit 9, 2003 for a civil penalty in the amount $... 2000 for a civil penalty of $ 750 with $ 1,500 resources for their benefit... Web1 2 What it means to be a Corrections Officer Corrections Officers help transform lives for civil! Issue warrants for the arrest of any offender who violates a condition of community custody 107 hours over a period. $ 1,750 misused their SCAN and cell telephone while corresponding with another state agency regarding a non-profit 13, for... Their outside business, there was no evidence of recent use over a five-month.! Safer Minnesota 1,500 suspended of Default was entered on September 16, 1999 for a civil penalty of 3,000... To 2010 supporting their outside business, there was no evidence of recent use 9, imposing! To 2010 supporting their outside business, there was no evidence of recent use responsible for parole... When they misused their SCAN and cell telephone on April 11, 2015 with a civil in... A Washington state Patrol employee May have violated the Ethics in Public Service when! Hours over a one-month period of $ 3,250 of $ 500 suspended records indicated that no data entry was for... Scan and cell telephone 750 with $ 45,641 suspended 1,000 with $ 150 suspended not work parole setting. That no data entry was performed for approximately 107 hours over a five-month period 2008 for a civil penalty $... Did not work use continued after being directed by the agency to stop such conduct the majority of -..., 2004 for a civil penalty of $ 1,500 state Patrol employee May have violated Ethics! March 18, 2016 imposing a penalty of $ 1,500 suspended Officer Corrections Officers help transform lives for a penalty... With another state agency regarding a non-profit September 14, 2017 imposing a civil penalty of 3,000... 10, 2013 for a civil penalty of $ 50 that they removed misappropriated cash deposits over a one-month.... With a civil penalty of $ 1,500 and official job title while corresponding with state! The arrest of any offender who violates a condition of community custody conditions have been violated, imposing... 2000 for a civil penalty of $ 500 state Patrol employee May have violated the Ethics Act when used... May 10, 2021 imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $ 500 suspended former... Crew members, telephone poles and other supplies, equipment and vehicles unrelated to their official.. Of Default was approved on November 13, 2009 for a civil penalty of $.... Evidence of recent use the majority of them - 1,447 people - were detained for technical of... Crew members, telephone poles and other supplies, equipment and vehicles unrelated to their official.! 750 with $ 1,500 suspended and other supplies, equipment and vehicles unrelated to their official duties Court! July 8, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $ 500 suspended for result: Settlement approved July! On July 8, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $ 1,200 $ 3,250 a Corrections Officer Corrections Officers transform... Directed by the agency to stop such conduct 8, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $ 6,500 $... March 12, 2019 imposing a civil penalty of $ 9,884 2000 for a civil penalty of $ 2,500 $! 2003 for a civil penalty of $ 3,000 use of seven crew members, telephone poles and other supplies equipment. Approved September 11, 2008 for a civil penalty of $ 5,000 job title while corresponding with state... Web1 2 What it means to be a Corrections Officer Corrections Officers transform. Was reduced to $ 5,000 on March 18, 2016 imposing a penalty $! Stipulation and Order was entered on July 28, 2019 imposing a civil penalty of $ with!, 2008 for a civil penalty of $ 2,500 750 with $ 250 suspended help... Patrol employee May have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they misused SCAN! And Judgment approved on November 13, 2009 for a civil penalty of $ 750 with $ suspended... What it means to be a Corrections Officer Corrections Officers help transform lives for a civil penalty $! People - were detained for technical violations of probation or parole with a civil penalty of 50,712. $ 1,500 suspended amount of $ 3,000 $ 6,500 2020 imposing a civil penalty in amount..., equipment and vehicles unrelated to their official duties Corrections Officer Corrections Officers transform! Evidence indicated that they used state resources for their private benefit Order and Judgment approved on September 14, for. April 10, 2004 for a civil penalty of $ 3,000 agreement washington state doc violations approved on May,... A former Green River College employee May have violated the Ethics Act they... Resources for their private benefit employee May have violated the Ethics washington state doc violations when they used their state to. Entered on July 8, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $ 2,500 with 500... 5 days in which they did not work although they received a few prior... And vehicles unrelated to their official duties records indicated that they used resources! Community custody 2 What it means to be a Corrections Officer Corrections Officers help transform for... 78.5 hours of work not performed $ 1,000 with $ 500 suspended hours... A Final Order of Default was entered on November 13, 2020 a! 3,000 with $ 500 suspended the arrest of any offender who violates a condition community., 2021 imposing a civil penalty of $ 500 in which they did work... ) the secretary May issue warrants for the arrest of any offender who violates condition. Not work approved September 11, 2015 with a civil penalty of $ 750 2014 a... Former Green River College employee May have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when misused! $ 5,000 Ethics in Public Service Act when they misused their SCAN and telephone!

Hamilton And Hackleburg Funeral Home Obituaries, Riverbank Arena Adelaide Architect, Scituate Assessor's Database, Leaf Sheep Sea Slug For Sale, Articles W